Machchars
in a Metro
From the makers of Baby Do Die Do
Machchars in a Metro is a horror-comedy about a deeply incompatible couple — expecting their first child — blissfully unaware that a strange new flower blooming wild from the city's toxic waste has become food for a mutant strain of mosquito, multiplying right inside their own home.
Now the two species are fighting over the same city.
Which one do you think wins?
Dr. Sanskriti Sharma has kept a journal since childhood — one entry for every mosquito she's killed, past 150,000 and still counting. Is it all the disease and death she sees as a physician talking? Or was she just built a little bit of a psychopath from the start? The film doesn't decide, and neither does she.
Her husband, Inquilab Qureshi, is the opposite in every way — warm, endlessly curious, a student of evolution who finds wonder in the smallest of life forms: insects, exactly the kind of things his wife wants dead. Right now, his object of interest is a strange new flower growing wild out of the city's industrial waste, thriving on the very toxins that should have killed it. What he doesn't know yet: this flower is about to become food for a new, mutant strain of mosquito, breeding faster than anything Gurugram has ever had to deal with.
His academic curiosity and her lifelong war are about to collide with the same discovery, at the same time, in the same home. And this time, retreating to opposite corners of the room isn't an option — Sanskriti is pregnant, and the fight against what's breeding in their city is no longer philosophical. It's personal — forcing two people who agree on nothing to protect the one thing they both want to survive.
Machchars in a Metro sits in the tradition of genre-blending social satire — Parasite's slow-building claustrophobia, The Host's monster-born-of-negligence premise. The mosquito plague works the way Bong's creatures and infestations do: an escalating, near-absurd genre engine that's really a lens on something more uncomfortable — a city whose ambition has outpaced its planning.
Where The Host indicts institutional denial, this film indicts something closer to home: a metro built glass-first and drainage-second, where a couple's private, increasingly absurd war against mosquitoes becomes a stand-in for an entire city's uneasy relationship with its own dysfunction.
Gurugram's skyline of glass high-rises has grown far faster than the civic infrastructure underneath it. Open drains, patchy sewage systems, and seasonal outbreaks of dengue, malaria, and chikungunya are the unglamorous, everyday reality behind the city's growth story.
Machchars in a Metro takes a domestic comedy of manners and lets it curdle into genre — using one couple's escalating, absurd war against mosquitoes to dramatize a much bigger question: what happens when a city builds upward faster than it solves what's happening at ground level?
I keep feeling like this story doesn't need inventing — like we're already living inside it. Covid was proof: man-made chaos forced the entire world to stop and readjust. What worries me is that we don't seem to have learned from it. This isn't a film about saving nature. Nature doesn't need saving — she'll save herself, by eliminating us, if we don't start behaving. And she has no shortage of weapons. Mosquitoes are one of them.
I chose horror-comedy because the story already has both in it. Mosquitoes taking over the world is genuinely frightening. But it's also funny — because of how absurdly small they are next to us, and because human ego refuses to take an insect seriously as a threat until it's too late. That refusal is the joke. What better mirror to hold up to a species that won't look at itself than an insect it has spent its whole existence swatting away without a second thought?
The choice is still ours. Mosquitoes are united in their fight. We are not — split between people comfortable with how things stand, like Sanskriti, and people who want to change everything without reckoning with the cost, like Inquilab. It comes down to one question: can two people who agree on nothing come together in time to survive? Let's see.
— Nachiket Samant, Writer & Director
Settled, comfortable in her ways, instinctively resistant to anything that asks her to change. Years treating illness and death in an overcrowded hospital have left her clinically detached, almost cold — channelled into an obsessively precise, ritualistic hobby of hunting mosquitoes at home. Controlled. Cynical. Quietly ferocious.
A confused revolutionary: well-meaning, but directionless. He's not out to change anything; he's simply the first to notice that something already has — a strange new flower thriving wild in the city's toxic waste, more curious than alarmed by what it might mean. His courtly, sentimental Awadhi sensibility collides with Gurugram's transactional, glass-tower pragmatism.
The names are deliberate: a culture that won't budge, up against a revolution that doesn't know what it's fighting for.
We are seeking visibility for the project ahead of production financing, and introductions to international co-producers, financiers, and sales agents with experience in genre-adjacent social satire.